PG&E Fine Rejected as Low

Posted on

PG&E’s Rancho Cordova blast fine rejected as low
UTILITIESSeptember 30, 2011|Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer

Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County — An administrative law judge on Thursday rejected as too lenient a $26 million fine against Pacific Gas and Electric Co. that the utility agreed to with state regulators for a 2008 natural gas pipeline explosion near Sacramento that killed a homeowner.

Instead, the judge recommended that PG&E be fined $38 million for breaking state and federal safety laws. If upheld, it would be the largest regulatory penalty ever against a California utility.

Judge John Wong, an administrative law judge for the California Public Utilities Commission, said a $38 million fine “is appropriate given the allegations in this investigation, PG&E’s acknowledgement and admissions, and the gravity and severity” of the blast in Rancho Cordova (Sacramento County) on Christmas Eve 2008.

The explosion happened after gas leaking from a distribution line that PG&E had earlier repaired using substandard pipe filled the home of 72-year-old Wilbert “Bill” Paana. His granddaughter lit a cigarette and the house exploded, killing Paana and badly injuring the granddaughter and her mother.

3-hour wait for help
Wong noted that it had taken PG&E almost three hours to dispatch properly equipped and trained workers to respond to a report of a gas leak in the neighborhood. The workers finally arrived just before the explosion.

The $26 million fine that PG&E agreed to in June with the Public Utilities Commission’s staff, Wong said, is “unreasonable and not in the public interest.”

Boosting the fine to $38 million will “send a clear message to PG&E that safety and reliability of its natural gas system must be its No. 1 priority,” Wong said. The company needs to be taught a lesson, he said, that its “lack of action and lack of initiative” on safety measures are unacceptable.

PG&E and the state commission have 30 days to decide whether to accept the higher fine.

David Eisenhauer, spokesman for PG&E, said the company was reviewing the decision and giving it “the full attention it deserves.”

If PG&E doesn’t agree to the fine, an administrative law judge will hold a hearing on the matter. Wong said that the company, if found guilty of every alleged violation, could be fined as much as $97 million.

Substandard pipe

VeriSign Trusted

VeriSign allow consumers to engage online with confidence.

Better Business Bureau

BBB Code of Business Practices represents standards for business accreditation by BBB.

CACES

The California Alliance for Competitive Energy Solutions is a coalition of public & private entities.

AReM

The Alliance for Retail Energy Markets is a not for profit corporation.